Why I Write What I Write
Recently I received an interesting review of my Barbary
Chronicles, sparking new thoughts into why I write what I write. It gave
me pause. While they recommended
the book, they included a note advising reader discretion. Because there’s a
death and description of wounds, and sensitive readers might object.
I had not received such warnings – from the same
organization, no less, albeit a different reviewer -- in my previous middle
grade titles. One targeted the deadliest battle of the Civil War,
The Girls of Gettysburg (Holiday House, 2014). The other depicted one of the
deadliest natural disasters when an earthquake triggered the Mississippi River
to turn backward, Big River’s Daughter (Holiday House, 2013). In fact, this new
book is quite calm when compared to these previous titles.
Certainly, it is not an invalid concern. Not every book
is for every child.
But it is also very true that every book has a child that
needs it. This is why librarians are superheroes. Their superpower is knowing
which book a child needs at the moment they need to read it.
I have to wonder about unintended consequences, especially
in this age of book bans. It’s a tenuous
balance (another reason why librarians are superheroes): trigger warnings can
play an important role, especially when content proves too much for certain
readers. But it is also a form of soft censorship.
Organizations like PEN America
report that book bans "kill creativity" and sow self-doubt, causing
authors to second-guess their instincts mid-writing. This is further reinforced
when, according to their report, one considers that:
- Offensive Language: Cited in over 60% of book challenges.
- Age Inappropriateness: Claims that material is unsuited for a specific grade or age group (approx. 49%).
- Marginalized Themes: LGBTQ+ narratives, racial history, and religious or political viewpoints face disproportionate pushback
Just as important, according to the ALA, those high-profile
book bans in schools and libraries send a chilling message to creators that
specific themes, such as those involving LGBTQ+ content, race, history, or
marginalized voices, carry high personal and professional risk.
The audience that I write for knows what it means to be
unseen. They know what it means to not have a voice. Not just because they are
marginalized by race and gender, but because they are poor. While poverty is a recurring motif in many historical novels, it is particularly relevant to American history of the late nineteenth century, coinciding with the ever-changing social conditions and urbanization. Economic hardship can be elaborate, multifaceted, and downright convoluted. Poverty serves as a subtheme that offers a window into what it means to be human. For my characters, their isolated
lives are complex and multi-layered because, then as now, young lives are too often
impacted by adults who fail to see them as worthy humans.
Not every young life is a fairy tale waiting to happen. Not
every young girl is a princess in waiting. Not every young boy is a prince, or
a wizard in hiding waiting to be chosen. All we need to do is watch the
news to see this playing out.
And for these young readers impacted by poverty,
exploitation, homelessness, and hopelessness, monsters are real enough in
a way that fairy tales – even the most dastardly type – are not.
So my stories reveal the struggles of those young types who
fight the real dragons, and how they are not just heroic, but heroes in their
own right. How they rise up to create their own destinies. How they learn to choose
themselves.
For myself, I refuse to soften their ordeals, and
minimize their greatness.
“You have to write the book that wants to be written. And if the book will be too difficult for grown-ups, then you write it for children.” ― Madeleine L'Engle
This post dedicated to all the librarian superheroes. Happy Writing and Reading!
-- Bobbi Miller

Comments
Post a Comment